![]()
Net 6 - The Long Walk on A C# Programmer’s Guide to Google Cloud Pub Sub Messaging Using Pub/Sub (or the Fanout Pattern) in Rabbit MQ in.Dew Drop – J(#3710) – Morning Dew by Alvin Ashcraft on Configuring your models with Entity Framework.A Cleaner Program.cs / Startup.cs with Scrutor.Testing an Asp.Net Web App Using Integration Testing. ![]() Configuring your models with Entity Framework.Net Core 3 Projects Using Azure Recent Posts Separation studio log in software#Software Architecture By Example C# 8 and. Search for: Follow me on Twitter My Tweets Separation studio log in code#*** Obviously, it does improve security for the site if everyone is using a 20 digit code and they start using non-alpha-numeric characters in that code however, if they’re using a password manager, they probably are already generating such a code, and if not then you’ll just force “Password123” to “!Password123”, so you probably don’t gain much! ReferencesĪn excellent intro to Asp.Net Core 2 default structure ** There’s nothing stopping you having the main DbContext inherit from IdentityDbContext, or just using IdentityDbContext as the main context. * Okay – there may be other pitfalls but if this works for 60% of the authentication cases, why not have it all inside a magic black box? When you need something more customised, you can always rip this out and replace it with your own. The same is true for Update-Database: Update-Database -context ApplicationIdentityDbContext Now that you have multiple contexts, when you add a migration, you’ll need to specify the context to use for example: Add-Migration "InitialUserSetup" -context ApplicationIdentityDbContext I also don’t necessarily accept that it increases security for the site***. You’ll notice that I switched the requirement to have your password have a non-alphanumeric character – especially for development, this can be annoying. I’m using SqlServer here, so if you’re not then you’ll obviously need to change the bits around that. = false Ĭonfiguration.GetConnectionString("DefaultConnection"))) Install-Package įinally, you’ll need to change the DI to register both contexts: There’s a couple of gotcha’s with this but the libraries that you need in the DataAccess project are: Install-Package Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore Your second context should just inherit from DbContext. Public ApplicationIdentityDbContext(DbContextOptions options) The contexts themselves need to be separate because the identity context inherits from IdentityDbContext**: public class ApplicationIdentityDbContext : IdentityDbContext If you just want the identity access, then you’ll only need to move theĪpplicationIdentityDbContext, however, in real life, you’re probably going to end up with two contexts: The crux of this is to move the context into a separate project so let’s start with a new project: So this is the story of how you can extricate the DB Access portion of this into a separate project. I see this as mainly a good thing, but with one exception*: I don’t like having the DB access code inside the main web project it makes DI very difficult. ![]() The reason being that all the code for the identity system is tucked away inside the razor pages. If you set-up a new project using the wizard to create an individual user account, you may notice in the generated project, the lack of seemingly any code to achieve this. ![]() Separation studio log in registration#In Asp.Net Core 2, like in previous incarnations of Asp.Net there is a wizard that gives you a head-start with a a simple user log-in / registration system: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |